Ap Literature Essay Grading Rubric

To sum up, make introductions brief and compact, using specific details from the poem and a clear direction that address the call of the prompt. Short, choppy, disconnected sentences make an incoherent, unclear paragraph.

Tags: Military Problem SolvingAnkylosing Spondylitis SpondylothesisResearch Papers On E-LearningProblems In Everyday Life That Need SolvingCustom Essays LabLiterature Review On InsuranceHow Write An Essay In English9 Step Problem Solving

Exam takers were asked to analyze the following: When you analyze the components of an influential essay, it’s helpful to compare all three sample answers provided by the College Board: the high scoring (A) essay, the mid-range scoring (B) essay, and the low scoring (C) essay.

All three provide a teaching opportunity for achieving a nine on the poetry analysis essay.

The specificity of the details in the introduction shows that the writer is in control, with phrases like “frequent alliteration,” “off-kilter rhyme”, and “diction evoking an almost spiritual level of power”. The mid-range B essay introduction also cites some specific details in the poem, like “visual imagery (of the juggler and his balls), figurative language (the personification of the balls interacting with the juggler), and tone (the playful mood of the first two stanza)”.

However, the writer wastes space and precious time (five whole lines! The mid-range answer also doesn’t give the reader an understanding of an overarching thesis that he or she will use the elements and devices to support, merely a reference to the speaker’s “attitude”.

Then, the writer wraps up the first point about description, devices, and elements by concluding that the unusual rhyme scheme echoes the unusual feat of juggling and controlling the mood of the crowd.

With a clear focus on attaching devices to individually quoted phrases and poem details, the student leads the reader through the first pass at proving the attitude of the poem’s speaker while commenting on possible meanings the tone, attitude, and devices suggest.

The short, choppy sentences don’t connect, and the upshot is something so commonplace as Wilbur describes a talented juggler, who is also a powerful teacher.

That doesn’t respond to the prompt, which requires an argument about what the juggler’s description reveals about the speaker.

For example, the second paragraph begins with an assertion that the speaker’s view of the world is evident through the diction used when describing the juggler and the juggler’s act.

Immediately, the writer supplies proof by directing the reader to the first and last stanzas to find “lens,” “dusk”, and “daily dark”.