To be accepted by referees and cited by readers, papers must do more than simply present a chronological account of the research work.
Rather, they must convince their audience that the research presented is important, valid, and relevant to other scientists in the same field.
One elegant way to express the desired part of the need is to combine it with the task in a single sentence.
This sentence expresses first the objective, then the action undertaken to reach this objective, thus creating a strong and elegant connection between need and task.
They attempt to place introduction ingredients into a sequence.
They identify the following series of ‘moves’ in a typical introduction to a research paper: Move 1: Establishing a research territory The above-mentioned elements of an introduction are helpful, and could be followed quite systematically to produce a reasonably acceptable introduction.You may also want to anchor your context in space (either geographically or within a given research field).Convey the need for the work as an opposition between actual and desired situations.To spark interest among your audience — referees and journal readers alike — provide a compelling motivation for the work presented in your paper: The fact that a phenomenon has never been studied before is not, in and of itself, a reason to study that phenomenon.Write the context in a way that appeals to a broad range of readers and leads into the need.(Papers reporting something other than experiments, such as a new method or technology, typically have different sections in their body, but they include the same Introduction and Conclusion sections as described above.) Although the above structure reflects the progression of most research projects, effective papers typically break the chronology in at least three ways to present their content in the order in which the audience will most likely want to read it.First and foremost, they summarize the motivation for, and the outcome of, the work in an abstract, located before the Introduction.In particular, you should avoid being 'anecdotal' in your introduction (i.e.writing as if you are telling a story), and you will also need to avoid wasting words by 'stating the obvious' and writing a series of over-generalised statements.To reach their goal, papers must aim to inform, not impress.They must be highly readable — that is, clear, accurate, and concise.