Scientific Research And Essays Impact Factor 2011

The hierarchical publication system (“journal rank”) used to communicate scientific results is thus central, not only to the composition of the scientific community at large (by selecting its members), but also to science's position in society.

Tags: Cd Cover Analysis EssayHistory Essay On StalinEnglish 10 Essay TopicsChoosing A Research Paper TopicPhd Social Work ThesisMaster Thesis On Strategic ManagementHow To Do Your Homework Really Fast5th Grade Math Problem SolvingUniversities For Creative Writing

Moreover, the data lead us to argue that any journal rank (not only the currently-favored Impact Factor) would have this negative impact. doi: 10.1038/nrd3439-c1 Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Cross Ref Full Text Rafols, I., Leydesdorff, L., O' Hare, A., Nightingale, P., and Stirling, A. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: a comparison between Innovation Studies and Business and Management. Risks of possible misuse and biased citation and impact data.

Therefore, we suggest that abandoning journals altogether, in favor of a library-based scholarly communication system, will ultimately be necessary.

A disturbing trend has recently gained wide public attention: The retraction rate of articles published in scientific journals, which had remained stable since the 1970's, began to increase rapidly in the early 2000's from 0.001% of the total to about 0.02% (Figure 1A). doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058 Cross Ref Full Text Obremskey, W.

In 2010 we have seen the creation and popularization of a website dedicated to monitoring retractions ( while 2011 has been described as the “the year of the retraction” (Hamilton, 2011). T., Pappas, N., Attallah-Wasif, E., Tornetta, P., and Bhandari, M.

Moreover, today's global problems cannot be solved without scientific input and understanding.

The more our society relies on science, and the more our population becomes scientifically literate, the more important the reliability [i.e., veracity and integrity, or, “credibility” (Ioannidis, 2012)] of scientific research becomes. The effect size (y-axis) represents the individual study effect size (odds ratio; OR), on a log-scale. This is plotted against the year of publication of the study (x-axis). To learn more or modify/prevent the use of cookies, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.Most researchers acknowledge an intrinsic hierarchy in the scholarly journals (“journal rank”) that they submit their work to, and adjust not only their submission but also their reading strategies accordingly. doi: 10.1038/485149a Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Cross Ref Full Text Scott, S., Kranz, J. The reasons suggested for retractions vary widely, with the recent sharp rise potentially facilitated by an increased willingness of journals to issue retractions, or increased scrutiny and error-detection from online media. (A) Exponential fit for Pub Med retraction notices (data from pmretract.heroku.com). Although cases of clear scientific misconduct initially constituted a minority of cases (Nath et al., 2006; Cokol et al., 2007; Fanelli, 2009; Steen, 2011a; Van Noorden, 2011; Wager and Williams, 2011), the fraction of retractions due to misconduct has risen sharper than the overall retraction rate and now the majority of all retractions is due to misconduct (Steen, 2011b; Fang et al., 2012). (B) Relationship between year of publication and individual study effect size. (2007), and represent candidate gene studies of the association between DRD2 genotype and alcoholism. restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. In this review, we present the most recent and pertinent data on the consequences of our current scholarly communication system with respect to various measures of scientific quality (such as utility/citations, methodological soundness, expert ratings or retractions). doi: 10.1039/a802808g Cross Ref Full Text Research Information Network. Activities, Costs and Funding Flows in the Scholarly Communications System Research Information Network. These data corroborate previous hypotheses: using journal rank as an assessment tool is bad scientific practice. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.20 Cross Ref Full Text Reedijk, J. Sense and nonsense of science citation analyses: comments on the monopoly position of ISI and citation inaccuracies. Report commissioned by the Research Information Network (RIN). This new system will use modern information technology to vastly improve the filter, sort and discovery functions of the current journal system. Science is the bedrock of modern society, improving our lives through advances in medicine, communication, transportation, forensics, entertainment and countless other areas. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00033 Pubmed Abstract | Pubmed Full Text | Cross Ref Full Text Prinz, F., Schlange, T., and Asadullah, K. Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?